A Truly Canadian Solution?

Guest Contributor: Steven Grob, Director Group Strategy, Fidessa

The merger mania in the exchange space took another twist last week when a consortium of Canada’s largest banks and pension funds put forward an alternative offer for TMX in an attempt to scupper the LSE Group’s own merger proposals with the Canadian exchange.

There’s a clue to the consortium’s basic pitch in its name – the Maple Group – and the rhetoric from its spokesman Luc Bertrand, who cites the fact that Canadian jobs will be saved in his all-Canada solution. This argument resonates well with domestic concerns over the LSE’s “merger of equals” as the LSE would have control over the combined group. History has shown, however, that protectionism only really works if the country concerned has some form of natural monopoly or real financial firepower (e.g. China).

So, will a Canadian-only stock exchange really be able to compete in the global exchange space and can Canadian capital markets really wait it out on the sidelines whilst other exchanges find partners? If the answer to either of these questions is in doubt, then maybe the LSE Group’s bid is actually the better outcome for Canada.

About Maureen Lowe

President and Founder of Financial Technologies Forum, LLC. Editor-In-Chief of FTF News. Entrepreneur, Jersey Girl that recently returned to Jersey, Loves to Bake, Married to a Kiwi, First Time Mom
This entry was posted in Clearing and Settlement, Guest Blog and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s